Which is first Egg or Chicken?

This old yet simple question has made most people baffled and it remains, unanswered. Theologians, Scientists, Philosophers and ordinary men have all tried to argued their way acrossed, though none provided a satisfied arguments. I, myself, came up with the idea to solve this question though in my humbleness i realized that my solution might still subject to various critiques. I will try to explain my answer for this question, which physchologist nowadays said that only a bunch of stupid people will bother to argue, in the next following paragraph. Afterwards, i will further discussed another mathematical function that was created not by mathematician (at least that's what i thought).

In the brink of which is first egg or chicken, one might said, "It is chicken!". then other might ask, "chicken come from where?". the answer is obviously egg. Hence, it didn't provide an answer to the main question. Here is the visual presentation of the answer :

Chicken --> Egg --> Chicken --> Egg --> Chicken --> Egg --> and so on and so forth
--> (red-come from)

This answer will just move around and around till the end of time. So does this means that the questions is unanswerable?

I personally will put in more variable factors inside this equation problems to find out the most possible answer logically. The critical factors to be added in is process and environment.

1. Process
How do the egg hatch? They needs the heat from hen for 21 days for them to hatch into chicks.
Hence, The solution is Egg can not hatch without chicken. This also made that egg can not come before chicken.

2. Environment
Can a chick or egg survive in "normal" environment ( hot in the day and cold in the night)? As we all know, chicks need their mother to survive. without their mother, it is almost impossible for a chick to survive in the nature.

These two interdependence of eggs to chicken made it logical for me that chicken must be the first entity that come to this earth. As an addition, we all know that all advance entity in this world developed from a cell. This cell united with other to form a more and more advance entity for billions of years. These cells will form an animal, not an egg. Egg is the process by which an animal reproduce themselves (like cells when they fragmented into two).

Hence, in conclusion, it is impossible for egg to come first before chicken given the two variables, process and environment, added into the main problems. Further, from the science perspective, to form an egg, we need chicken; but chicken can be the result of the evolution of a more primitive beings which was at the first time a single cell.
......


As said before, i will also like to discussed about some funny mathematical equation which i first read about 5 years ago. I have just read it again recently and i think, the creator do not understand basic mathematics. by the way, I know they created it for fun and it is some kind of creativity but here i just want to outline some mistakes in their assumptions.

First, i need to say is that this is a purely personal view and very subjective in nature. I am not a mathematician, i am just a ordinary man who put what i thought into blog post.
First of all, i will show you the maths :

Equation 1 : Study = No Fail (1)
Equation 2 : No Study = Fail (2)

Sum up the two equation :

Study + no Study = No fail + fail
Study (1+no) = Fail (1 + no)
------------------------------- Eliminate (1+no)
Study = Fail.


The main problems with this mathematical analysis is that they didn't separate which are variable and which are not variable. "study" and "Fail" are the variables whilst "No" in the "no study" and "no fail" is NOT. No essentially is a form of word-usage expression of a mathematical terms called negate, negative, or opposite. So the no in the equation actually means "-"(red-minus) in the mathematical form.
here is the presentation of the problem above :

Study = - Fail ....(1)
- study = Fail .....(2)

Sum up the two equation :
Study + (-study) = (-fail) + fail
the result is zero in left and right side.

so the conclusion above that study = fail is not valid because they treated "no" as variable while it is actually means "negate, negative, or minus".

Anyway, this is just for fun too. Nothing much, just an idle head that wants to keep thinking. My apologize if you think this post is totally useless. LOL...